Your Ad Here

I quoted Lon Milo Duquette in my post, Pagan Idolatry: How To Do It And Why You Should and he came across the post and commented—turns out we both have Ganesh altars! Lon has been a substantial influence on my thinking and philosophy, so I immediately asked if he would grant an interview to Belief Systems & Other BS, and he graciously agreed. The interview is below, with my questions italicized.

Do I banish? Do I invoke? Do I evoke spirits? Yes

For those who don’t recognize the name, Lon Milo Duquette is among the most visible and eminent modern ceremonial magicians. He’s an authority on Aleister Crowley and his magical systems, a high ranking member of the Ordo Templi Orientis, and a prolific and exceptionally talented author who has published some of the very best and most accessible modern expositions of ancient magical systems such as Enochian and Goetic magick. His writing is marked by grace, humility, and humor, and authority based on extensive research and experience. That he is a member of the Illuminati seems obvious, though he has yet to admit as much in public.

The interview below contains a scoop—the subject and proposed name of Lon’s next book. Enjoy.

What’s a typical day like for one of the world’s most visible magicians? Do you have a daily magickal practice?

Since I left my 9 to 5 job to become a full-time Lon back in 2003 there hasn’t been a typical day. One thing hasn’t changed, however, and that’s my daily preoccupation with affecting the magical miracle of keeping a roof over our heads and the medical insurance paid.

I travel a lot giving workshops, lectures all over the country and world. I am probably most magically disciplined when I’m on the road. I take full meditative advantage of the hours of unbroken silence as I stand in airport security lines and sit quietly at the gate area. My hotel room becomes my hermit’s cell, where the meager equipment necessary to maintain my life and comfort is neatly bundled into one bag.

Do I banish? Do I invoke? Do I evoke spirits? Yes. Even on the road I do these things, But after decades of performing pentagram and hexagram rituals, Star Rubies, Star Sapphires, etc. my personal banishings, invocations, and evocations have taken on extremely personal dimensions and might not (indeed, SHOULD not) be recognizable or understood by others.

At home a typical day starts between 3:00 and 3:30 AM. Before I get out of bed I do a general ‘getting-off-on-the-right-foot-personal banishing/invocation’ that would take me all day to describe …so I won’t. I then grab a cold bottle of mineral water from the refrigerator and shut myself in my office and start writing. I’m usually working on the next book, but I also have two or three other smaller projects –usually introductions or forewords to other people’s books, or lecture/workshop material that need attention. I’ll work on two or three chapters at the same time. I’ve found that when I get burned out on one train of thought I need only change the subject to feel completely refreshed and energized.

I try to write until around 8:00 AM. By then Constance has been up for awhile and brings me a cup of tea. I continue pecking on the book, but I also start checking my email and getting myself enmeshed in the objective reality of the day. I’ll take a walk around the neighborhood or the nearby parks before coming home to breakfast on the backyard patio. Constance has our tiny backyard garden teeming with flowers (and a few squash, green beans and tomatoes). The roses are insane! So are the humming birds.

We say ‘will’ (a Thelemic affirmation) before all our meals. We also try to recite ‘Resh’ in the morning, noon, sunset, and before retiring.

I stay in the office for most of the day. I get some serious work done, but I have to confess I spend far too much time farting around with my email….LIKE I’M DOING NOW! and working on scheduling my talks, etc. I have my guitar on a stand right behind my chair and I play it to unwind. I probably now play my guitar 2-3 hours a day… more when I have a gig that evening.

I try to catch a nap in the afternoon. Then I get up and take another walk before dinner (or, on nights I have a singing gig, a little snack). I try to get to bed around 11:00PM. Then the whole thing starts over again. Aren’t you sorry you asked?

Is it reasonable to consider magick done to elevate or refine the self as being different from magick done to ‘get things’—that is, to get a better job, or a place to live, or a creative opportunity? If so, how do you strike a balance between the two?

“Elevating and refining the self” is the reason you do magick “to get things done”.

Should have asked this first, probably, but: do you prefer ‘magick’ or ‘magic’?

I don’t care anymore. I use “Magick” when the audience as an understanding and appreciation of term, and “Magic” when the audience is so green that the “k” would be just one more bit of confusion, i.e., I title one book “The Magick of Aleister Crowley” and other, “The Key to Solomon’s Key – Secrets of Magic and Masonry”. I don’t however use the word “Magickal.” I don’t know why. It just bugs me.

In My Life With The Spirits: The Adventures of a Modern Magician you discuss delightful adventures with the Goetia and with Enochian magick; what have been your ongoing experiences with these branches of magick?

Glad you asked! I’ll write a lot more on both those subjects in my new book (should be out in 2010). It’s called (if the publisher allows) “Low Magick”. Until then, I’ll have to ask you to wait.

How important a figure has Aleister Crowley been in your life?

Very important.

I noticed you were on the faculty of Maybe Logic Academy: what do you teach, and were you close to Robert Anton Wilson?


I knew Bob, but I can’t honestly say we were real close. Our lodge presented him with our ‘annual’ Illuminati Award. Every year for a few years running the organizers of Pantheacon booked us to share the same hotel room. That was a kick.

So far I’ve taught four classes at Maybe Logic Academy – two each of “Understanding Aleister Crowley’s Thoth Tarot” and “Initiation – The Western Magical Tradition”. I’m about to give new class on “Enochian Vision Magick.” Stay tuned!

If an intelligent young person, interested in magick, asked you for three books to read, what would you suggest?

I have to be shameless and suggest three pairs of books:

Crowley’s Magick: Book 4, Liber Aba and my The Magick of Aleister Crowley: A Handbook of the Rituals of Thelema.

Crowley’s The Book of Thoth and my Understanding Aleister Crowley’s Thoth Tarot.

[Belief Systems & Other BS note: You'll also want the Aleister Crowley Thoth Tarot Deck discussed in the above two volumes]

Crowley’s The Goetia: The Lesser Key of Solomon the King (Clavicula Salomonis Regis) and my The Key to Solomon’s Key: Secrets of Magic and Masonry.

Thank you very much.

You’re welcome.

Did you like this interview? You’ll love my books!

  • Share/Save/Bookmark

{ 2 comments }

It’s more like my dreams don’t avoid spoilers.

I have mildly precognitive dreams. When I record my dreams for a few weeks, and review them, I find slight but definite foreshadowings of real life events. This capacity of mine does not extend, yet, to reliable stock predictions but it is entertaining and a reminder that we humans mingle with eternity on a nightly basis, whether we remember it or not.

Let me share three such dreams, in descending order of probability:

it’s as if I somehow contain a larger, smarter mind than the one I use daily

First, I recently dreamed that I would be meeting with a restaurant owner and that he would be giving me advice. And in fact, the following day, this event did take place. Now, this dream is not mysterious—the fact is, I knew about the meeting, but it had slipped my mind. It would be fatuous of me to claim psychic abilities for what is plainly a case of the subconscious merely reminding me of a previously scheduled event. On the other hand, it does demonstrate that information is processed below the level of conscious thought.

Second, I once dreamed of escape through a long, wet, exceedingly narrow tunnel. The next night, impulsively, I decided to watch The Shawshank Redemption, a movie I hadn’t seen before and didn’t know much about. But the climactic scene was familiar; Andy Dufresne’s escape through a narrow, watery sewer exactly replicated the scene from my dream. Now this, I aver, begins to resemble a genuinely psychic event. I hadn’t seen the movie and had not, at the time of the dream, even decided to watch it. But perhaps I read a review or overheard conversations about the movie. So it’s possible that, here again, I subconsciously processed information not available to me consciously; it’s even possible that my subconscious engineered the event by prompting me to rent the movie, close the loop begun with the dream, and thus have the rather thrilling experience of foreseeing the future. But if so, how fascinating; it’s as if I somehow contain a larger, smarter mind than the one I use daily, a mind that organizes more information than I am able to, a mind that, apparently, has its own agenda.

My final example is somewhat disturbing, [click to continue…]

  • Share/Save/Bookmark

{ 2 comments }

Oh, and that ripping sound? It’s also a feature of UFO experiences.

In 1990, Rick Strassman injected 60 people with 400 doses of the illegal drug dimethyltryptamine. But Strassman wasn’t breaking any law—he was the first federally approved researcher in 20 years to study the effect of a psychedelic on human subjects.

Here is one more weird thing about DMT—you’re on it right now

Dimethyltryptamine—known as ‘DMT’—is surely one of the strangest chemical substances found on our chemically rich planet. It is possibly the strongest of the plant hallucinogens (though Salvia Divinorum is definitely in the running) and even among veteran psychonauts it is spoken of with awe–gonzo drug theorist Terence McKenna used to say that the biggest danger of DMT is that a person could simply ‘die of astonishment’. For one thing, DMT is one of the relatively few drugs that can produce true hallucinations, defined as virtual experiences that are indistinguishable from reality. And DMT is nearly unique in that it consistently delivers one of the strangest experiences humans have—encounters with aliens. In Strassman’s study, 20% of those injected reported clear, detailed encounters with alien beings, all taking place in what the volunteers usually referred to as, ‘another dimension’. That is, after injection with DMT, 1 in 5 of Strassman’s subjects experienced entry into another plane of existence where they met aliens. Less formal ‘trip reports’ suggest that the ratio is much higher for those experimenting at home, and that the experience is even stronger when the drug is smoked rather than injected.

What’s astonishing about the alien encounters is that they are incredibly weird and yet remarkably consistent. Nearly all users report a strange ripping sound [click to continue…]

  • Share/Save/Bookmark

{ 0 comments }

Way to go God, really excellent work!

It occurred to me, recently, that all religion is at least mildly insulting to the divine. For think about it: religions, of all flavors, always assume that humans are somehow wanting, are incomplete or imperfect or unhappy, are somehow in need of help from a pastor or guru, or faith or doctrine or special diet, or something. And so religions put themselves in the position of perfecting God’s creation… and that, I assert, is a little insulting: for why would the God or Goddess, or however you style the divine, need human help to get things right? Shouldn’t we assume that He or She knew what they were doing? Wouldn’t the genuinely faithful have a little, well, faith that everything is just precisely as it should be, including our own miserable, sniveling selves?

So Christianity is pretty bad, but the other religions are hardly better

Christianity is the worst in this regard assuming, as it does, that all men, and even women, are not only born fatally flawed, but will be tortured and/or destroyed by the divine unless they submit to a bizarre and highly variable set of rules and contort their reasoning powers to accept evidence free propositions, for example that the all-that-is was created a few thousand years ago by their preferred theocrat in a literal six days, or that said theocrat, once upon a time, flooded the entire Earth in a fit of pique. And in most versions of this cheerful belief system, even rigorous adherence to such inanities is not enough to guarantee salvation; worshipers are still subject [click to continue…]

  • Share/Save/Bookmark

{ 10 comments }

Of course, I’m not currently a member of any secretive, sex-magick-practicing, world-bank-manipulating cults…

In middle school some friends and I exploited the fact that one of our acquaintances had got himself a job as clerk at the campus snack concession. Through a combination of persuasion and intimidation we induced him to sell us sugary treats at greatly reduced prices and for several weeks we gorged ourselves on cheap, empty calories. But then, alas, we were busted: a member of our tong folded under pressure and sold out the rest of us to school administration.

it’s curious, isn’t it, that we tend to assume conspiracies are always pernicious

The whole adventure was, if you will, a conspiracy. The group of us conspired together for private gain, and were semi-successful. So it has never seemed impossible or crazy to me to suggest that the larger world is also a playground for conspiratorial groups… rather, it strikes me as an inevitable byproduct of human association. For after all, if even schoolchildren secretly associate, with some success, to further their own ends it is hardly shocking to suggest that adults, too, take advantage of organized, clandestine activity to enrich themselves at the expense of others. In fact, some historians blithely maintain that the story of civilization is a tale of various secret societies struggling with each other for primacy in world affairs, and that governments, religions and corporations are mere window dressing employed by these shadowy clubs to cloak their hidden agendas.

But if my tale of middle school skullduggery [click to continue…]

  • Share/Save/Bookmark

{ 2 comments }

Borders are Borderline

April 24, 2009

A couple of years later I crossed into Mexico again, and this time my legal situation considerably improved. But that’s a story for another time…

Years ago, when I and my former partner in state-sanctioned cohabitation were planning a trip to Baja California, I must admit the prospect filled me with dread. I am a timorous, paranoid traveler and border crossings especially make me faint with anxiety. I understand that my fears are imaginary, but then, so are borders—after all, a border is just an invisible line defined by fearful men. Borders are merely belief systems, intangible constructs of civilization; they don’t exist but they can be located… and thus, they are real and the consequences for crossing them are certainly real—men are routinely killed when caught on the wrong side of a border.

to cross a border is to become a different person

Borders are settled arguments; a border is the line drawn between schools of thought. To cross a border is to become a different person; for humans too are constructs of civilization. On one side of a border I may be law abiding, on the other, a criminal. By one country’s standards I may be moral, while next door I am a disgusting pervert. In pre-Civil War America, a man who crossed the Mason-Dixon line might be transformed from slave to freeman or vice-versa.

Of course, it is not the man who changes; it is the standards by which he is judged. But standards don’t cross borders as readily as men, and men are defined by standards. Thus, men are defined by the borders they keep. It may be that without borders we are barely human; [click to continue…]

  • Share/Save/Bookmark

{ 0 comments }

Or, “I’m Not Anonymous!”

Once upon a time I was vice-president of the Blue Sage Center for the Arts in Paonia, Colorado and one of my duties was to organize the annual lecture series. I normally liked the chore, but sometimes I had bad chemistry with the proposed speaker and because I am a petty, small-minded man I would then drag my heels on every little task, promote the event ineffectively, kvetch endlessly, and generally make an ass of myself. Even so, I always attended the lectures and on one occasion, listening to the introductory comments from a speaker who had particularly grated on me, I was astonished to hear him relating an essay… that I had written. The piece is titled Confessions of a Heavy Thinker, and is posted below.

So I basically sat and fumed for the duration of the talk, and then accosted the speaker immediately after he concluded. His response was simple and disarming: ‘Oh, did you write that? I found it on the internet.’ Even more discomforting was the prompt exclamation of someone listening in: ‘You wrote that? Somebody emailed it to me a couple of weeks ago!’

Have you Christians no shame?

Subsequent googling confirmed my fears: apparently I had had 15 minutes of internet fame and hadn’t even been aware of it. I wrote the piece in 1989, and it first appeared, under a pseudonym, in the June 1st New Times, an alternative paper (quite a good one) in San Luis Obispo County, California—in fact, it was my first publication of note. It appeared another three times in New Times—under my name, these times—because the owner/editor, Steve Moss, liked it and it was his paper, and it also appeared in the San Francisco Chronicle, under my name. Somewhere along the way Confessions of a Heavy Thinker leapt to the internet, apparently shorn of any attribution to me… that or it was stolen. At any rate, it appears on several hundred sites, always without my name attached, and occasionally claimed as the fruit of another’s authorial loins. Here are some examples:

Curtis Dahlgren doesn’t claim to be the author of my work, but he does copy it shamelessly, and twists it—by substituting a few words—to slam liberals. Well, it was written by a liberal; suck on that, Curt. And yes, please remit to me any monies received for copying my work.

The ‘author’ of Confessions of a Quackbuster, a shitty abandoned blog, copies my work, appears to take credit for it, and adds a graceless, incoherent addendum that twists it to his purposes. I’m sounding a little angry, aren’t I?

One A. James Dehayes uses my piece in a newsletter, and says he heard Steve Brown read it on Key Life Network, a Christian radio producer. Fie on you, Key Life! Have you Christians no shame?

Another Christian, Bryan Patterson, who publishes a column in Australian newspapers, published my piece as his writing. Dick.

Oh, and some guy named Gene Stone published it on Huffington Post. At least he didn’t change it, or take credit for it.

My feelings are of course complicated. On the one hand, I am an author and of course I want the credit which properly belongs to me and of course I despise those who plagiarized and adapted my writing without permission. Especially the ‘faithworks’ guy. Chumps. And, pathetically, I want every bit of Google love and every single link generated to somehow be directed, now, to me. But on the other hand, I’m rather proud that it did so well on its own, as one is rather proud of the hitherto unknown illegitimate child who turns out to have become a doctor. At any rate, I here claim Confessions of a Heavy Thinker as my own original creation and call out my plagiarists as, well… I guess calling them plagiarists is bad enough. If they are decent, they will apologize for their heinous sin, withdraw their copies of my work, provide a link to its appearance on my blog, and remit any compensation received to me. Thanks for reading my hissy fit.

cheers,
Angus

Did you like this essay? You’ll love my books!

  • Share/Save/Bookmark

{ 6 comments }

The piece below is actually my first published piece, and in a weird twist of internet fate, took on a life of its own entirely independent of me, an experience I describe above.

It started out innocently enough. I began to think at parties now and then, to loosen up. Inevitably though, one thought led to another and soon I was more than just a social thinker. I began to think alone, “to relax” I told myself, but I knew it wasn’t true.

Thinking became more and more important to me and finally I was thinking all the time. You know the pattern; I denied it, of course, but I wasn’t fooling anybody but myself. I thought I had my thinking under control… how wrong I was.

“That’s a faulty syllogism,” I said impatiently

I began to think on the job. I knew that thinking and employment don’t mix, but I was too far gone to stop myself. “Boss” I’d say, “why do we offer half-price coupons, when the coupon program itself costs money to run? Why don’t we just lower prices?” Or I’d say, “Hey Boss, we’ve been advertising this product as ‘new and improved’ for ten years!” Naturally he was furious.

“Skippy” he’d shout, shaking his fist, “we don’t pay you to think around here!”

But I would only listen to reason. I began to avoid friends at lunchtime so that I could read Thoreau or Kafka. I’d return to the office slightly disoriented, asking, “what is it, exactly, we do here?” I tried to talk about politics, even religion. I soon had a reputation as a heavy thinker. Golf invitations came further and further apart, then stopped. One day, the boss called me in. He said, “Skippy, I like you, and it hurts me to say this; your thinking has become a real problem. If you don’t stop thinking on the job, you’ll have to find a new job.”

This gave me a lot to think about.

Things weren’t going so well at home either. My wife had caught me staring off into space on several occasions. “What are you thinking about?” she’d snap. “Nothing,” I’d snap right back, but she knew it was a lie. I was sneaking thoughts around the house now, spending extra time in the bathroom or the garage. One evening I turned off the TV and asked her about the meaning of life. She spent the night at her mother’s.

I came home early after my conversation with the boss. “Lambchop,” I confessed, “I’ve been thinking…”

“I know you’ve been thinking,” she said, “and I want a divorce.”

“But Poopsie, surely it’s not that serious.”

“It is serious,” she said, lower lip aquiver, “You think as much as college professors and college professors don’t make any money so if you keep on thinking we won’t have any money.”

“That’s a faulty syllogism,” I said impatiently, and she began to cry. I’d had enough. “I’m going to the library,” I snarled as I slammed out the door.

“Don’t take the car,” she screamed, “You’ll kill yourself.”

But it was too late.

I headed for the library, in the mood for some Nietzsche, with This American Life blaring on the radio. I roared into the parking lot and ran up to the big glass doors… and they didn’t open. The library was closed. To this day, I believe a higher power was looking out for me that night.

As I sank to the ground, scrabbling at the unfeeling glass and whimpering for Zarathustra, a poster caught my eye. “Friend,” it asked, “is heavy thinking ruining your life?” You probably recognize that line. It comes from the standard Thinker’s Anonymous poster.

It was then, for the first time, I admitted the truth to myself. I had a serious thinking problem. My life was a wreck. I was almost out of a job. My wife wanted a divorce. Even my priest was giving me stiffer penance than usual, after I asked him about the Church’s role in the Spanish Inquisition. I made a solemn vow to myself that I would get the help that Thinker’s Anonymous offered.

Which is why I am what I am today: a recovering thinker. I never miss a TA meeting. At every meeting we watch a non-educational video: last week it was Porky’s. Then we share experiences about how we avoided thinking since the last meeting. After that, the meeting breaks up and we sit around eating Cheese Whiz on crackers, chatting, and reading back issues of TV Guide. They’re a great bunch of guys. We watch a lot of football together.

Life isn’t easy for the non-thinking thinker. There are a lot of temptations to think, especially in election years. I take it one day at a time. You might have seen me around town. I’m the one with the bumper sticker that says IT’S OKAY NOT TO THINK.

I still have my job and things are a lot better at home. Life just seemed… easier, somehow, as soon as I stopped thinking. I like to think God has forgiven me, even if the priest hasn’t. So I’ll never think again, that’s for sure. It’s hard sometimes; just yesterday, I began to wonder what life would be like if we all stopped to think now and then… I caught myself just in time. It’s best not to get started thinking like that.

Did you like this essay? You’ll love my books!

  • Share/Save/Bookmark

{ 1 comment }

Happy High Holy Day

April 20, 2009

Or Holy High Day, if you like.

Let’s be safe out there.

cheers,
Angus

  • Share/Save/Bookmark

{ 2 comments }

On Having an Unusual Name

April 17, 2009

Too bad I’ll never publish the pornography on this blog…

Occasionally an otherwise blameless chicken will sprout a black feather or some other damned spot that catches the attention of its peers and they will peck at the flaw, curiously at first, until a featherless spot develops, and then a wound, and then the flock pecks with something more like malice, and the gang plucking continues until little is left of the hapless fowl but a bloody red smear on the chicken yard floor.

an endless variety of nicknames such as Genghis, Gus, Dingus, Anus and—in retrospect my favorite—Fungus

And that’s exactly what it’s like to be a kindergartner with a name like ‘Angus Stocking’. In a sea of Toms, and Pats, and Roberts, I alone stood out and my classmates hung on me an endless variety of nicknames such as Genghis, Gus, Dingus, Anus and—in retrospect my favorite—Fungus. At first, desperate for some role in the flock, I accepted and even encouraged these monikers but the day came when some sense of self-preservation led me to resist and I began to beat up anyone who called me anything but the name assigned to me at birth. Fortunately, I was a large and resilient lad and did pretty well in the recess wars and soon enough, at least to my face, my name was Angus.

This put me in a curious position. Part of me still hated being different, and for many years I secretly wished to be called Craig, a name I now use as a pseudonym when publishing pornography. But publicly I was a proud defender of my unusual appellation. The name Angus, after all, is derived from Angus Og, the Celtic god of love and laughter, is the name of a great many Scottish heroes and writers, and you know what they say about Angus beef… once you’ve tried it, you’ll never go back.

I got so comfortable being the guy with the funny name that it was a substantial shock when at Boy’s State, a summer camp for budding politicians, I met another young man named Angus. We had much in common, were the same age, and he seemed eager to be friends. I hated him. That he should have the same name as me seemed deliberately offensive, and to call another person by my name was so repugnant that I refused to do it, and I was inexcusably rude to… Angus, until he got the hint and went away.

It was just such events that my father had hoped to avoid when naming me. His name was ‘Bob’, and growing up he resented being one of several Bobs in any group. So he married a woman named after the wickedest city in the Bible, Corinth—and surely that was part of the attraction—named me Angus, and my brother is Garth—stuck with the most common of names, he collected unusual names about himself. And for many years this made me feel sorry for myself and angry at him. But meeting this other Angus led to a shift in my thinking: rather than feeling sorry for myself, I began to feel sorry for the rest of you with your humdrum names, your Steves and Marys and Daves and Kathys and Jims… with the same label as millions of other humans, how do you people even know which one is you?

Eventually I realized that my father had given me a priceless gift: by sticking me with a weird name he freed me to be weird, which is to say, he freed me to be myself. He died before I thought to thank him, so let me say it now—thanks Dad.

Did you like this essay? You’ll love my books!

  • Share/Save/Bookmark

{ 1 comment }